<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Ron Rackley &#8211; The Broadcasters&#039; Desktop Reference</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.thebdr.net/author/ron-rackley/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.thebdr.net</link>
	<description>Edited by Barry Mishkind - the Eclectic Engineer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 17:05:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The FCC’s AM Revitalization R&#038;O, Further NPRM and NOI</title>
		<link>https://www.thebdr.net/the-fccs-am-revitalization-ro-further-nprm-and-noi/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron Rackley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2015 03:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[FCC Rules & Regulations]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.thebdr.net/?p=3996</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[November 2015] As everyone continues to pick apart what the FCC did and what they seem to intend in the AM Revitalization Report and Order, we seem to have a fair amount of agreement on what are the high points and what is missing. The well-respected Consultant Ron Rackley offers his thoughts as we look [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
